Driver defence

“The department includes senior associate Tim Williamson, whose ‘work ethic is matched by his acumen and judgement’.”

Legal 500 UK 2017
Our Driver Defence team has the expertise to give you the best possible advice and representation when facing criminal prosecution or the loss of your licence due to alleged road traffic offences.
We provide an initial consultation with one of our specialist lawyers for a fixed fee.

Download Blake Morgan's Motoring Offences fees

Main areas of practice

Our Driver Defence specialist lawyers have a national reputation for successfully defending drivers facing legal action. The high standing of our legal experts in the Driver Defence team is reflected in the fact that they are regularly asked by the media and industry groups to comment on complex cases.

The Driver Defence team has a huge amount of experience in dealing with all types of motoring offences that include:

Significant experience

Our Driver Defence team have an enviable record in its defence of motorists, often by close examination of the evidence as well as whether the correct procedures have been followed by the police and Crown Prosecution service. Examples of their success include:

  • Helping a client who mistakenly pleaded guilty to 'failing to name the driver' when she thought she was pleading guilty to a speeding offence and as a result received six penalty points. Once instructed, we had the case re-opened so that our client could plead 'not guilty' after which the Crown Prosecution Service offered no evidence. She was awarded a defendant's costs order so her costs would come out of central funds.
  • Acting for a client who dedicates the vast majority of his spare time to helping others and working on a voluntary basis for which he needs his car. He was worried that he would be disqualified from driving for six months because he had accumulated too many penalty points in a three year period. We represented our client at the Magistrates Court where it was agreed that such a disqualification would cause others, "exceptional hardship" as well as our client and so the Magistrates exercised their discretion not to disqualify him.
  • Representing a client accused of speeding. While the client disputed the accuracy of the speed check, our advice and subsequent action was to make detailed representations to the court office and the prosecuting agency highlighting the fact that the 'Notice of Intended Prosecution' had been served one day outside the 14 day statutory period and, accordingly, the statutory prohibition on conviction applied. Having considered the representations, the prosecuting agency arranged to withdraw the proceedings.
  • Representing a client facing allegations of careless driving, failing to stop after an accident and failing to report the accident to the police. Our client had maintained that he had not driven carelessly and had stopped following a minor collision which had occurred when engaged in a parking manoeuvre. He had not reported the incident to the police as the other party involved had refused to exchange details and was unaware of any damage to the other vehicle. We advised the client to offer a plea of 'not guilty' to all counts and obtained witness statements from two other occupants of the client’s motor car who had witnessed the circumstances of the incident. Our client and the witnesses gave evidence at a trial that concluded with trial our client being found not guilty on all three counts and awarded a defence costs order meaning that their costs would be paid from central funds.
  • Representing a client who, it was alleged, had failed to stop at a red light. The client denied the allegation made by two police officers. Upon careful examination of the officer's witness statements, it transpired that both officers stated that the traffic lights remained at red for 30 seconds after our client had allegedly driven through the red signal. We obtained witness statements from independent witnesses and the local traffic management office which demonstrated that the officers must have been mistaken because the entire traffic light sequence lasted for only 18 seconds. This evidence was presented to the Crown Prosecution Service, who formally dropped the case prior to the start of the trial. Our client kept his driving licence and was awarded his costs.
  • Representing a client who was charged with being drunk in charge of a motor vehicle after being found slumped in the driver’s seat of his car with the engine running after which he was arrested and subsequently found to be nearly five times over the legal limit. He pleaded not guilty to the charge on the basis that there was no likelihood of him driving whilst he was over the legal drink drive limit as he contended that there was no need for him to drive for the rest of the day. We instructed an expert to report as to when exactly he might have been back below the legal drink drive limit and successfully represented our client in court so that the magistrates found him not guilty of the charge, dismissed the case against him and ordered that his costs be paid from central funds.

“Professionalism but treating me as a human being also ranks highly.”

Client 2016

Related expertise

Main contacts

Related Knowledge & Resources

Government opens a consultation looking at reform of cycling laws


Leading Criminal and Regulatory lawyer, Tim Williamson, welcomes the opening of a consultation to look at the reform of cycling laws.

Received a notice of intended prosecution? Don't delay in submitting your driver's details.


The High Court has reiterated that it will not be a defence for a person accused of 'failing to supply the police with driver details' to argue that they left the completed form nominating the driver with someone else for them to post.

Campaign for new cycling laws

Press Release

Criminal and regulatory lawyer, Tim Williamson, Comments on the case of a former courier who knocked down and killed a mother-of-two while riding an illegal Olympic-style racing bike.

Regulatory and Criminal Lawyer comments on road policing chief's demand for days of 'soft' treatment come to an end

Britain's road policing chief has called for punishments for speeding motorists even if they are just 1mph over the limit. Driver defence expert, Tim Williamson, shares his thoughts on what this means for the future of speeding prosecutions:

Beware the court of public opinion!

UBER has today learned that Transport for London (TfL) has refused its application for a Private Hire Operators' licence. Our expert explains what this will mean for the company going forward.

The welcome announcement of special traffic courts

Tim Williamson discuss the set up of new specialist traffic courts in England and Wales.

Tougher sentences for speeding

Tougher sentences for speeding came into effect on 24 April 2017. The highest speeds will be punished with a fine equivalent to 150% of a driver's weekly income. Our expert explains how this will work.

Driving while banned

The number of people in Britain caught driving while already banned has increased by 7.5%, according to figures obtained by the BBC.

Tougher fines for most serious speeding offences

Changes revealed today by the Sentencing Council will see drivers caught well above the speed limit facing fines of 150 per cent of their weekly income – up from the 100 per cent previously imposable.

Not guilty – Client accused of permitting the use of a vehicle without insurance and speeding

Blake Morgan successfully advised a client accused of permitting the use of a vehicle without insurance and speeding.

Case dropped – Client fails to receive speeding notice

Blake Morgan successfully advised a client on receiving a speeding notice and the case was dropped.

Motorist receives leniency because of flaw in police procedure

Our Driver Defence team recently acted for B who faced a charge of driving a motor vehicle with excess alcohol at Portsmouth Magistrates' Court. Barry Culshaw, explains the case and the outcome.