Regulatory, Compliance and Prosecutions

“Blake Morgan are very professional, efficient and effective. They are also very personal and provide a tailored approach.”

Chambers and Partners 2019

“They are an extremely professional and capable firm. The team has excellent knowledge and understanding of regulatory matters and is adaptable to the needs of the individual client.”

Chambers and Partners 2018
Our team is one of the largest in the UK, recognised as a leader in the field and a go-to firm for organisations and individuals needing help and support with investigations, hearings, audits and prosecutions. 

Whether you are a statutory body, regulator, business or individual, we can help you.

Our team of specialist and dedicated lawyers act for organisations conducting investigations and presenting cases and for those facing investigations, prosecutions and compliance action. This team of lawyers is supported by what we believe to be one of the largest in-house advocacy teams comprising barristers, solicitor advocates and solicitors, all of whom specialise in this area of law and many of whom are ranked in Legal 500 and Chamber & Partners. 

Please click on the links below to find out how we can support you:

Related expertise

Main contacts

Related Knowledge & Resources

Blake Morgan's Professional Regulatory Bulletin - November 2018

News

Welcome to another of our professional regulatory case law updates.

SFO v EURASIAN NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORTATION [2018] EWCA Civ 2006

News

Guy Micklewright looks at why this case is important for corporations and other organisations carrying out internal investigations to establish how to respond to a possible criminal investigation.

Blake Morgan's Professional Regulatory Bulletin - June 2018

News

Welcome to another of our professional regulatory case law updates.

PSA v NMC and X [2018] EWHC 70 (Admin)

An appeal by the Professional Standards for Health and Social Care against the decision of the NMC not to pursue allegations that a Registrant was responsible for non-accidental injuries to her son and/or a failure to protect Baby A from harm.

General Medical Council v Bawa-Garba [2018] EWHC 76 (Admin)

The Divisional Court allowed the GMC’s appeal against the decision of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal (“MPT”) to suspend Dr Bawa-Garba’s registration for 12 months and substituted the sanction of erasure from the Medical Register.

Yussouf v SRA [2018] EWHC 211 (Admin)

This case concerns an appeal against the Respondent SRA’s Adjudication Panel, on the grounds that the panel’s finding of dishonesty were based upon a two-stage test of dishonesty, namely the objective and subjective test.

B v General Medical Council [2018] EWCA Civ 1497

This case gives important clarity to data controllers in confirming the correct test to be applied when considering a Subject Access Requests in "mixed data" cases.

General Medical Council v Shekhar Chandra [2018] EWCA Civ 1898

This case emphasises the importance of the overriding objective and confirms the test to be applied in restoring doctor's to the register.

Raychaudhuri v GMC and PSA [2018] EWCA Civ 2027

Court of Appeal confirms the Medical Practitioners Tribunal findings that a doctor had not acted dishonestly.