Professional regulators

“Their main selling point is understanding the different types of regulation and what regulatory bodies need and want.”

Chambers UK A Client's Guide to the Legal Profession, 2014
Blake Morgan is the national leader in providing a full range of legal services for Professional Regulators.  

The highly respected team are ranked top tier in Chambers UK, A Client's Guide to the Legal Profession and The Legal 500 UK. Seven experts in Professional Discipline, within the team, are also recognised independently as 'leaders in their field'.

Main areas of practice

Services and advice that we regularly provide for our Professional Regulator clients include:

  • Investigations 
  • Tribunal Advocacy
  • Appeals and Judicial Reviews 
  • Statutory framework, drafting and governance 
  • Legal adviser services to committees
  • Training
  • Auditing of decisions and processes 
  • Information law advice 

For further detail on each of these areas please visit our Professional Regulatory expertise page.


With an unparalleled depth of experience and the largest specialist team in the UK, it is no surprise that their client base includes an impressive range of regulators across the sector. Just some of the Regulators that we currently advise and act for include:

Architects Registration Board General Osteopathic Council
Association of Accounting Technicians General Pharmaceutical Council
General Optical Council Education Workforce Council  
Care Council for Wales National College for Teaching and Leadership
General Dental Council Nursing and Midwifery Council
Association of Chartered Certified Accountants  Solicitors Regulation Authority
Bar Standards Board Institution of Mechanical Engineers


Significant experience 

The highly experienced team have a well-earned reputation in the industry for acting quickly and decisively in cases of suspected misconduct. 

Our highly skilled advocates have extensive experience of appearing on behalf of clients before Courts and Regulatory Tribunals.

Examples of this include:

  • Investigations:  Assisting our clients in some of the most high profile and complex investigations they have undertaken, including cases with multiple registrants, allegations spanning over a number of years and dealing with sensitive and vulnerable witnesses.  
  • Advocacy and Representation:  Our regulatory barristers and solicitors, all of whom specialise in presenting cases before Fitness to Practise Panels and Conduct and Competence Committees, appear weekly before tribunals in the healthcare, accountancy, legal and other sectors.  We have received particular praise for the depth and quality of our in-house advocacy resource.
  • Legal Advisers:  Our team regularly sit as legal advisers to Committees and panels of several professional regulatory bodies. This includes advising panels assessing suitability for registration in addition to Investigating Committees and panels hearing allegations of impaired fitness to practise.
  • Drafting: On behalf of our professional regulatory clients, we have assisted in the drafting a range of key documents. concerning professional standards and training in addition to those relating to investigations and hearings. Examples include Codes of Professional Conduct and related guidance, protocols for exchange of information, disciplinary rules and procedures and indicative sanctions guidance.

Additional expertise 

Professional Regulator clients of Blake Morgan also benefit from the other specialists within the firm in Public Law, Data Protection and FOI and Judicial Reviews.

“Their rapid expansion beyond pure healthcare work has not gone unnoticed; there is ‘no shortage of work’ at the firm, and it ‘has become a serious player.”

The Legal 500 UK 2013

Related expertise

Main contacts

Related Knowledge & Resources

Professional Regulatory newsletter - September 2017


Welcome to the September edition of our Professional Regulatory newsletter.

ET fees ruled unlawful – what next for employers?


Our employment expert considers some of the further detail of the Supreme Court's ruling to make employment tribunal fees unlawful, the implications this will have for employers and what to take into consideration going forward.

Blake Morgan's Professional Regulatory Bulletin - July 2017


Welcome to our July update on all the relevant case law and important news in the Professional Disciplinary legal sector.

Dealing with de-brief requests from unsuccessful bidders

Minimise the risk for challenge by following the below tips as far as possible.

Hinchingbrooke – where next for franchising?

The news today that Circle is going to pull out of the Hinchingbrooke franchise will no doubt lead to the normal range of NHS 20/20 hindsight judgements on the failure of the private management of Hospitals but has the whole scheme been such a failure?

Professional standards authority for health and social care appellant against General Dental Council (First Respondent) S T (Second Respondent)

The PSA appealed a decision by the GDC committee on the basis that its decision was unduly lenient on the Registrant.

Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2017] CSIH 29 (Inner House, Extra Division)

An appeal by the PSA after a decision by the NMC that a nurse's fitness to practise was not impaired despite a finding of dishonesty.

SRA v Libby [2017] EWHC 973 (Admin)

The Appellant regulator appealed a decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, dismissing three allegations of misconduct on the part of the Respondent solicitor.

Ogunlola v NMC (Admin Court, 19 October 2016, unreported)

The Appellant did not have strong grounds to bring an appeal and it is of note that a significant ground was instantly rejected, as it had not been pursued via the correct route.

Anwar and Ahmed v National College for Teaching & Leadership (1) The Secretary of State for Education (2) [2016] EWHC 2507 (Admin)

A timely reminder for all prosecutors of their disclosure obligations, especially in proceedings where there are a number of hearings arising from the same facts.

R(on the application of Rothschild) v GDC [2015] EWHC 1632

This case is significant in two respects. First, it confirms that section 40 of the Dentists Act 1984, which precludes unregistered persons (which encompasses suspended dentists) from receiving payment for dentistry carried out by other people...