SRA update health and wellbeing in the workplace guidance


10th May 2023

Following approval from the Legal Services Board on 19 April 2023, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued updated guidance, “to help law firms and those who work for them understand what new rules on health and wellbeing in the workplace mean for them.”

The guidance, first published on 7 February 2022, was updated on 2 May 2023, to require firms and individuals to include specific obligations in their Codes of Conduct to treat colleagues fairly and with respect, and not to engage in bullying, harassment or unfair discrimination.

The guidance states that the SRA has received complaints that some firms have an, “unsupportive, bullying or toxic working environment and culture.” There is particular concern that there is evidence which shows some solicitors with protected characteristics experience higher levels of unfair treatment at work, including women, people from a Black, Asian or minority ethnic background, those with a disability, junior solicitors and LGBTQ+ solicitors.

In the news release introducing the updated guidance, SRA Chief Executive, Paul Philip, said:

The legal sector can be a very fast-paced and demanding environment in which to work. While it is up to firms how they run their individual businesses, it does become a regulatory issue if poor working cultures start to impact staff wellbeing, behaviour and ultimately standards of service to the public. That is where we have a duty to act.

Referencing a number of recent cases, the SRA has made it apparent that poor working conditions not only impact the wellbeing of individuals, but also present a regulatory risk, where a firm’s culture may contribute to individuals committing misconduct. This in turn results in poor outcomes for clients, as well as reduced public confidence in the profession.

The guidance places an obligation on a firm’s managers to challenge unfair behaviour, which requires them to take effective action to address the behaviour which has been witnessed. In doing so, the manager/firm will be expected to consider whether it is appropriate to report incidents to the SRA. The SRA has provided the following examples:

  • Where a challenge to unfair behaviour is attempted but does not succeed in ending the behaviour. This may raise regulatory concerns because the unfair behaviour has continued even after being challenged, and/or because the firm has failed to resolve the issue.
  • Where a challenge does succeed in a particular instance, but the nature of the unfair behaviour may still pose regulatory risks.
  • In cases involving a senior member of staff which cannot realistically be challenged successfully within the firm.

The SRA has made it clear that it will act if it is believed that there has been a serious regulatory failure. Essentially, firms should do everything they reasonably can to guard the wellbeing of those working in the firm, by protecting them from bullying, harassment, discrimination and victimisation, whilst supporting them to work safely and effectively.

The updated health and wellbeing in the workplace guidance helpfully references a number of other SRA guidance documents encouraging good practice, as well as some external resources.

In the guidance, the SRA acknowledges that a career in law will at times be pressurised and stressful but that it should nonetheless be rewarding. Indeed, the SRA’s Workplace Culture Thematic Review found that three quarters of respondents were working in a broadly positive environment. For anyone who is not, the SRA encourages them to report their concerns.

If you would like advice on anything from this article

Speak to a member of our regulatory law team

Arrange a call

Enjoy That? You Might Like These:


articles

20 March -
The Anaesthesia Associates and Physician Associates Order 2024 (AAPAO) was made on 13 March 2024. The AAPAO is significant for two reasons: It brings anaesthesia associates and physician associates into... Read More

articles

19 March -
How do you grow a business? Not an easy question to answer as there are so many elements for start-ups to consider, but taking on board advice from those that... Read More

case-studies

21 February -
In an appeal against a Fitness to Practise panel decision, the High Court considered the issue of the correct basis for a case being remitted for re-hearing. This proved to... Read More