This article first appeared in HR Magazine on 23 January 2019 and click here to read the article.
The Court of Appeal has held that a whistleblower’s colleagues can be personally liable for dismissal-related detriments and the losses flowing from the dismissal.
Partner Ragiv Joshi looks at the recent Court of Appeal decision in Timis and another v Osipov that has brought whistleblowing to the forefront yet again. He examines the protections that are afforded to whistleblowers and how individuals qualify for this protection.
The court upheld the decisions of the employment tribunal and employment appeal tribunal. This comes as attitudes towards whistleblowing are changing, as demonstrated by YouGov’s research into public attitudes.
Explore more insights
Articles 19 August
Significant Supreme Court decision about scope of protection for part-time workers
In Augustine v Data Cars Ltd, the Supreme Court confirmed that a worker’s part-time status does not need…
Articles 12 August
Employment Rights Act 2025: October 2026 implementation dates confirmed
The implementation dates for the Employment Rights Act 2025 have been confirmed for October 2026. We look at…
Articles 11 August
Employment Rights Act 2025: timeline updated and trade union consultation outcomes published
The Government has recently published consultation outcomes for trade union measures and an updated implementation timetable for the…

