This article first appeared in HR Magazine on 23 January 2019 and click here to read the article.
The Court of Appeal has held that a whistleblower’s colleagues can be personally liable for dismissal-related detriments and the losses flowing from the dismissal.
Partner Ragiv Joshi looks at the recent Court of Appeal decision in Timis and another v Osipov that has brought whistleblowing to the forefront yet again. He examines the protections that are afforded to whistleblowers and how individuals qualify for this protection.
The court upheld the decisions of the employment tribunal and employment appeal tribunal. This comes as attitudes towards whistleblowing are changing, as demonstrated by YouGov’s research into public attitudes.
Explore more insights
Articles 25 September
Right to Work reforms from 1 October 2026: what employers should know
Employers that engage labour through agencies, contractors or other flexible workforce arrangements face additional Right to Work obligations…
Articles 24 September
Thank you, Next! Equal pay ruling overturned in favour of Next
Next has been successful in appealing the equal pay litigation ruling made in 2024 by the Employment Tribunal.
Articles 23 September
Employment Rights Act 2025: Flexible working changes to take effect in autumn 2027
The Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a reasonableness test for flexible working requests. These changes are due to…

