Avoid the pitfalls of removing the boss

Posted by Nicola Diggle, 21st May 2018
Removing senior directors goes against the grain in business. Extracting the leader certainly deviates from the norm but can be performed as and when necessary. However, there are many pitfalls that would need to be avoided should this sensitive and intricate issue arise.

The often perplexing matter needs to be carefully studied with an abundance of legal considerations that should be taken into account.

The problem is big decisions usually come from the top but there have been recent examples where the most senior figure in a company has been deposed. Like Harvey Weinstein, who was ousted from the board of Miramax, the independent film company he co-founded, in October 2017 in light of allegations. Earlier that year in June, Uber supremo Travis Kalanick resigned from his position as chief executive following criticism of an unethical culture at the company.

Internal investigations of impropriety can bring about the downfall of those at the summit as the company and shareholders wish to avoid unwelcome controversy. However, bosses do sometimes return as Steve Jobs did at Apple. He was removed in 1985 because of a power struggle with John Sculley but made his comeback in 1997 as he was reinstated.

Shareholder issues need to be considered as do all potential legal matters involved in removing directors to avoid becoming lost in the morass of firing the boss. This is where our expertise can help you negotiate the minefield.

Enjoy That? You Might Like These:


22 March - Vikki Sidaway
Our costs law team explore cases where the High Court has ruled that solicitors cannot be ordered to give former clients copies of documents which are the property of the... Read More


22 March - Stephanie Walls
A High Court case concerning a dispute between step-sisters over which of their parents died first, demonstrates the importance of understanding how assets are held and the way in which... Read More


22 March - Vikki Sidaway
The Court of Protection has jurisdiction to make decisions regarding the welfare of someone who lacks capacity to make their own decisions, for example as to where they should live... Read More