New Charity Commission guidance on charitable investments


8th August 2023

The Charity Commission produced new Guidance aiming to provide greater clarity and confidence for trustees in relation to the investment decisions they make on behalf of charities.

The new Guidance, which came into force on 1 August 2023, is an update to the CC14 Charity Commission Guidance, Investing Charity Money, and is intended to be clearer, shorter and easier to use.

The renewed guidance comes further to the Commission’s call for information and consultation on financial investment in 2021, whilst also factoring in the High Court judgment in the Butler-Sloss case in 2022.

1. Changes in the New Guidance

Like the previous Guidance, the new Guidance emphasises the key principle that charity trustees must make investment decisions to further their charity’s purposes. From there, it is up to them to decide how best to invest in order to support delivery of your charity’s purposes over time.

Within the options available to each charity, charity trustees must always:

  • 1. Comply with the legal duties and requirements set out in the CC14 Guidance;
  • 2. Make decisions in the best interests of their charity; and
  • 3. Keep their investment approach under regular review.

So far, so similar to the previous Guidance. However, there are some key differences. In particular:

  • 1. The new Guidance sets out the key duties applicable to charity trustees when making financial investments, and a useful list of some example approaches that trustees can take when doing so. We have set these out in section (2).
  • 2. It takes into account the Butler-Sloss case, and offers a more permissive approach towards the inclusion of “non-financial factors” being included in financial investments. We have explored this further in section (3).
  • 3. The new Guidance no longer uses the terms “ethical investment” or “responsible investment”, following feedback in its consultation that these terms were not particularly clear or inclusive. Instead, it refers simply to two types of investment:
    • 1. “financial investments“, which are made primarily in order to obtain financial returns for the charity, but can take into account non-financial factors such as sustainability and impact characteristics; and
    • 2. “social investments“, which are made primarily in order to directly achieve the charity’s purposes, while ideally also making a financial return.

In a similar vein, the Commission has now retired the use of “mixed-motive investment” or “programme-related investment”, clarifying that these both fall into the category of “social investment” above.

  • 4. It makes it clear that all charities which invest are expected to have a written investment policy, and sets out guidelines for charity trustees to use when setting that policy, encouraging them in particular to think about returns, risk, time horizon and liquidity. Further details about this are set out in section (4).
  • 5. Finally, the new Guidance requires trustees to take professional advice when making and reviewing investments (which can include advice from one of the charity trustees, if they are suitably qualified), and offers direction on how to delegate their investment duties to an investment manager. We have explored this further in section (5).

2. Trustee Duties when Making Financial Investments

The new Guidance sets out the duties of charity trustees in relation to charitable investments, and states that in addition to the general trustee duties (which always apply), the following specific duties apply when making financial investments:

  1. Consider whether the investments are suitable for your charity and whether they will meet its investment objectives. This means taking account of how suitable any investment is for your charity: both the investment type (for example, shares) and particular investments within that type (for example, shares in a specific business).
  2. Consider the need to diversify investments. This helps to spread and alleviate risk, for example by owning shares in a number of different companies or sectors.
  3. Take advice from someone experienced in investment matters, unless you have a good reason for not doing this. For example, this might not apply if you have enough expertise in your trustee group or you have limited or low-value investments.
  4. Review your charity’s investments at appropriate intervals. The new guidelines for reviewing and reporting on a charity’s investments are set out in section (6) below.

To offer more clarity, the Guidance also offers a non-exhaustive list of some example approaches to financial investments which trustees could adopt. These include:

  1. Aiming only for the best financial return you can achieve, within the level of risk that you have decided is acceptable for your charity.
  2. Avoiding investments that conflict with your charity’s purposes. For example, a health charity may decide to avoid investment in companies that mainly produce alcohol, tobacco, or highly processed food, or an environmental charity might decide to avoid investment in fossil fuels.
  3. Avoiding investments that could reduce support for your charity or harm its reputation, particularly amongst its supporters or beneficiaries. For example, a charity may decide to avoid investment in fossil fuels where the trustees can show that this would be in its best interests by avoiding damage to its reputation or fundraising. Investments in this category are sometimes described as bringing an “indirect” conflict with a charity’s purposes.
  4. Avoiding or making investments in companies because of their practices on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors. These could include the climate, human rights, sustainability, community impact and board accountability. Taking this approach could be in your charity’s best interests if it could protect or enhance the financial value of your investments or returns over time, or because it will support delivery of your charity’s purposes more directly.
  5. Using your shareholder vote, or other opportunities that come with your investment, to influence practice at companies that your charity is invested in. As with the example above, taking this approach could be in your charity’s best interests because it could protect or enhance the financial value of your investments or returns over time, or because it will support delivery of your charity’s purposes more directly.

3. Implications of the Butler-Sloss Case

The new Guidance directly addresses the implications of the Butler-Sloss case for charity trustees when investing charity assets going forward.

By way of reminder, the background to the Butler-Sloss case was as follows:

  • This case was brought to the High Court in 2022 by the trustees of two charities, the Ashdean Trust and the Mark Leonard Trust. The main charitable purposes of the two charities were environmental protection and improvement.
  • The trustees wished to adopt investment policies that would exclude investments which did not align with the 2016 Paris Agreement, although this was likely to bring lower returns, and so sought the court’s approval for the adoption of their proposed new policies, to ensure that they were acting lawfully.
  • In its judgment, the High Court noted that the trustees’ powers to invest must always be exercised in furthering the charity’s purposes. It held that although this would, ordinarily, mean maximising the financial returns on any investment, trustees have a discretion as to whether to exclude investments that they reasonably believe are in conflict with their charity’s purposes, even where such exclusion may be of a financial detriment to the charity.
  • You can read the full High Court judgment of Butler-Sloss & Ors v The Charity Commission for England and Wales & Anor 2022 here. For our analysis of the case, please see our blog posts from May and December.

In essence, then, the judgment seemed to suggest that charity trustees have the option to exclude investments which conflict with their charity’s purpose.

In the new Guidance, the Commission reflects this judgment by looking specifically at what trustees should do when they identify potential or current investments which could (a) conflict with the charity’s purposes, or (b) harm the charity’s reputation. It advises that when such investments are identified, trustees must balance:

  1. All the factors that are relevant to the charity’s circumstances and investment decisions;
  2. The extent of any potential conflict and how likely and serious it is; and
  3. Any potential financial effect of a decision to exclude the investment.

Crucially, trustees must ensure that:

  • Any excluded investments are, in fact, contrary to the charity’s purposes and not just contrary to trustee’s “personal motives, opinions, or interests”; and
  • Any decision relating to investment and excluded investments is documented clearly in writing before such an investment decision is made.

Further advice is then provided in the legal underpinning published with the new Guidance, which can be found here. In this legal underpinning, the Commission acknowledges the importance of the case, stating that “Butler-Sloss is now the leading case in this area, and this judgment is central to the basis for the Commission’s guidance on investment by trustees.”

The key point to take away from this is that charity trustees have the discretion to determine which investments will be in the best interests of their charity, and may exclude those which conflict with the charity’s purpose or could harm its reputation, provided that they consider and clearly document the reasons behind that decision, and can demonstrate that such a decision is made with the best interests of the charity in mind, rather than the ethical principles of the trustees.

4. Setting a Written Investment Policy

The new Guidance clarifies that charities must have a written investment policy if:

  1. Its governing document requires it to have one; or
  2. It is structured as a charitable trust or unincorporated association, and gives an investment manager powers to make investment decisions on its behalf.

Charities which are companies or another type of corporate entity are not legally required to have a written investment policy (unless their governing document requires it), but the Commission expects all charities which invest to have a written policy.

All of the charity’s trustees, relevant staff, sub-committees and professional advisers must be familiar with the policy and capable of implementing it where appropriate.

A charity’s investment policy must include the charity’s purposes and plans, and how its investments fit with these.

It may include the following (depending on the size and complexity of the charity):

  • What the charity’s governing document says about how it must invest;
  • The charity’s investment objectives, including any relevant reputational and other non-financial factors;
  • Any sectors or organisations which the trustees consider are in conflict with the charity’s purposes;
  • The charity’s timeframe for investment – short, medium or long-term;
  • How easily or often the charity needs access to its money;
  • The charity’s attitude to risk;
  • Its approach to ESG factors and engagement with the companies it invests in;
  • How it will monitor and review its investments, including key benchmarks; and
  • Who the charity’s investment advisers and managers are, their responsibility and remit, and how it will work with them.

The policy should be reviewed regularly and discussed with all new trustees.

Importantly, the Commission states in the new Guidance that it is unlikely to have concerns about a charity’s investment policy provided the trustees can show that they have:

  • Complied with their trustee duties and the charity’s governing document;
  • Considered and balanced relevant factors for the charity;
  • Taken advice, unless they have a good reason not to; and
  • Reached a reasonable decision.

5. Taking Professional Advice

The new Guidance sets a clear expectation on trustees to take professional advice before making and reviewing investments, unless they have a good reason not to.

As for the charity’s written investment policy, this is only legally required of charitable trusts and unincorporated associations (unless the charity’s governing document requires it), but is strongly recommended for all incorporated charities which make investments too.

Professional advice must be (a) impartial and (b) provided by someone experienced in financial and other matters relevant to the charity’s investment approach. Although usually provided by an investment manager, it can be given by another individual (including a trustee of the charity), provided they have sufficient experience and ability to do so.

Where a trustee gives professional advice to their charity:

  • The trustee advising their charity is responsible for the quality of that advice, and may be held responsible if the charity does not meet its investment objectives because of poor advice; and
  • The charity’s other trustees must (a) consider the advice objectively in order to ensure they do what is best for the charity and (b) identify and manage any potential conflicts of interest that could affect the trustee providing the advice.

The new Guidance also offers a checklist of factors to consider when choosing an investment manager. In particular, when selecting them, trustees should think about:

  • How they will deliver on the charity’s investment policy, including any reputational and other non-financial objectives;
  • The type and number of portfolios the provider manages;
  • The value of the assets they manage;
  • Their experience of managing charity investments;
  • Their fees and charges in the short and long-term;
  • Their investment selection and risk-review process;
  • Their ability to adapt their approach to suit the charity; and
  • Whether the charity may need more than one investment manager, to help to spread risk or to access a particular product or market.

Trustees may wish to run a formal tender process when choosing an investment manager. At the very least, they should compare investment managers and costs and consider meeting with shortlisted providers.

When selecting an investment manager, trustees should be satisfied that:

  • The manager can deliver on that charity’s investment policy and objectives;
  • Appropriate reporting arrangements are in place;
  • They know what payments and charges to expect;
  • They know about any benefits the manager or anyone else will receive under the charity’s agreement with them; and
  • The costs of the arrangement are good value for the charity’s money.

Final thoughts

The new Guidance offers clarity to charity trustees, by setting out their legal duties when investing their charity’s assets, while also acknowledging their discretion to make decisions within a wide possible range of investment options.

In particular, trustees of charities which invest are clearly expected to take professional advice and put an appropriate written policy in place, and as always, must look to further their charity’s purposes when making investment decisions. The new Guidance gives clearer guidance on how, specifically, trustees can do so.

The incorporation of the Butler-Sloss ruling into both the new Guidance and the legal underpinning which accompanies it would appear to signal greater freedom for trustees in their decisions regarding investments going forward, particularly in relation to excluding investments which conflict with their charity’s purposes, or could harm the charity’s reputation.

Addressing charity trustees directly, Helen Stephenson CBE, Chief Executive of the Charity Commission noted in the press release which accompanied the new Guidance that “We want to stress that investment approaches are your decision to make, and this guidance is designed to help you do so with confidence, and in line with the law.”

If you have any queries about the topics discussed above, or there are any other issues we can help you with, please do get in touch with Laura Sherratt or Ben Brice.

Speak to a member of our Charities team

Arrange a call

Enjoy That? You Might Like These:


events

25 April -
We are delighted to invite you to join us for the latest in our series of Public Sector Insights webinars taking place on 23 May 2024, from 10am to 11am. Read More

events

8 April -
Whether a school or academy trust, all who have contact with children have a duty to safeguard them. Senior leaders in the School and Academies sector, Designated Safeguarding Leads, SENCOs,... Read More

events

28 February -
We were delighted to host a virtual webinar on Wednesday 20 March, giving an update on the latest in procurement law. Read More