Stamp Duty Land Tax 3% surcharge ‘Replacement of only or main residence’ and the three-year rules
The higher rates of SDLT are intended to apply to purchases of additional residential properties, such as second homes and buy to let properties. The design of the surcharge is however more complicated than one might expect. One of the areas which causes the greatest difficulty is the exception from liability for transactions which involve the replacement of the buyer’s only or main residence and the associated three year conditions.
This exception can save buyers paying the surcharge in some situations where they have another property, or even a portfolio of other properties. The technical rules often have seemingly arbitrary results which are hard to justify in policy terms.
The focus of this article is on the three year rules as they apply for the exception to the 3% stamp duty land tax surcharge for the replacement of an only or main residence.
Recovery of surcharge where the old property is sold after the new one is bought
We are looking here at a case where someone sells their old home (a former only or main residence) after buying a new home, intending it to be their only or main residence. The buyer might own other properties as well.
Whether or not the buyer owns other properties, “at the end of the day of the transaction” on which the new house is bought, the buyer will own two or more dwellings (at least the old home and the new home). So the 3% SDLT surcharge is due on the purchase of the new home. The question is whether the surcharge can be reclaimed if the old home is later sold.
For this situation, the three year rules are in effect already. The statutory conditions for having a right to reclaim the surcharge can be summarised as:
(a) On the completion of the purchase of the new home the buyer intends the new home to be the buyer’s only or main residence
(b) within the next three years the buyer or their spouse or civil partner sells or otherwise disposes of the old home (or at least a major interest in it)
(c) at any time within the three years leading up to the purchase of the new home, the old home was the buyer’s only or main residence.
The old home could be anywhere in the world, so long as it is owned on the basis of a freehold or a lease for over seven years, or an equivalent in the local jurisdiction.
So there are two three year tests to contend with where the old property is sold after the new one is bought:
- sale of the old home within the three years following purchase of the new home and
- residence in the old home within the three years before the purchase of the new home.
This can hit hard those who have already let out their old home for a while.
Three year rules not in place yet if the old home is sold at the same time or before the new home
We are looking here at a case where someone sells their old home at the same time as or has sold their old home before (perhaps a long time before) buying their new home, but has interests in other properties that would mean that the 3% surcharge could be due.
This is the area that perhaps causes the most confusion but can save buyers from paying the surcharge in unexpected situations. In the fullness of time (for purchases completing after 26 November 2018) there will be two three year tests, rather like the ones in place now for the recovery of the surcharge described above. But that is a long way off, so let us concentrate on the rules as they now are.
A buyer would escape the surcharge for a purchase by 26 November 2018 if the following conditions (paraphrasing the wording of the legislation) are met:
(a) On completion of the purchase of the new home the buyer intends the new home to be the buyer’s only or main residence
(b) in a transaction on the same date or earlier than the purchase of the new home the buyer (or the buyer’s spouse or civil partner at the time) disposed of a major interest in another dwelling (“the sold dwelling”)
(c) at any time before completion of the purchase of the new home the sold dwelling was the buyer’s only or main residence
(d) at no time on or after the disposal of the sold dwelling has the buyer (or the buyer’s spouse or civil partner) acquired a major interest in any dwelling with the intention of it being the buyer’s only or main residence.
As before, the sold dwelling could be anywhere in the world.
So even a sale years ago of a previous main residence could be available now to help gain the benefit of the replacement of only or main residence exception.
Only for individuals
The replacement of only or main residence exception is only available for purchases by individuals, not for example by purchases by companies or housing associations. Nor would it apply to someone buying a property jointly with an institution, such as the Church or a University.
A discretionary trust cannot rely on the exception, even if it is to replace a home for one of its beneficiaries (such as a disabled person who is often the beneficiary of a discretionary trust).
For some other trusts, such as where a beneficiary has a right to live in the property for life or has a right to income, one looks at the circumstances of the beneficiary to see if the surcharge is due. So a trust with a beneficiary having a life interest may be able to replace the home of the beneficiary by a sale and purchase without the surcharge being due even if the trust or beneficiary owns other property.
Remember that for those with spouses or civil partners, their other halves are normally treated as if they are joint buyer of the property being bought, even if they are not a joint buyer. Also note that with joint buyers one applies the SDLT surcharge tests to each buyer as if they were a sole buyer. If for any of the buyers the surcharge would be due, then the surcharge is due on the whole purchase.
These rules (and some other features of the surcharge) can be illustrated by the following scenarios.
Scenario 1: Single person returning to the UK
I am a single person returning to the UK from France. I used to live in my own house in London (my only residence at the time) which I sold five years ago. I then moved to France and lived in rented accommodation. I bought a small flat in Paris whilst I was in France to rent out, but never intended to live in it. That is now worth well over £40,000 and I am keeping it. I also inherited a one third share in a house in Cardiff from my father two years ago. I am paying £200,000 for a house I am buying in Southampton which will be my only residence.
Paragraph 3.20 of the HMRC Guidance Note of 16 March 2016 on "higher rates for purchases of additional residential properties" suggests that I have to pay the 3% surcharge on the whole price of the Southampton house, costing me another £6,000. It suggests the replacement of main residence exception does not apply because the sale of the London house was more than three years ago (and also because I had not lived in the London house at any time in the last three years).
Do I have to pay the surcharge?
The inherited Cardiff property will not count against you because it has been inherited in the last three years and you have less than a 50% share in it.
The Paris flat, however, does count against you as your interest is worth more than £40,000. It does not help you that it is an overseas property. So the surcharge will apply to your Southampton purchase unless something else saves you, like the "replacement of only or main residence" exception.
The replacement of only or main residence exception should help you here. You mention paragraph 3.20 of the guidance, published 16 March 2016 but if you read on to paragraph 3.22 you will see that the three year rules do not apply for acquisitions by 26 November 2018. The replacement was not "used up" by your later purchase of the Paris flat as you never intended to live in it.
So if you buy your new Southampton house to live in by 26 November 2018 you should not suffer the surcharge.
HMRC updated their Guidance Note and issued it on 29 November 2016, the relevant section 3.16 - 3.26 has been largely rewritten and is now less confusing.
Scenario 2: Buying a new main residence and an investment property
We are now moving out to the country and are looking to buy two properties, a flat to let out and a house for us both to live in. They will be entirely separate transactions and we expect to be buying from unconnected sellers. We will pay more than £40,000 for each of them. Will either or both purchases be subject to the surcharge?
(a) House first and the flat later (or if you buy them both on the same day).
On the purchase of the house, the surcharge will not be due as at the time you will only have an interest in one dwelling (or if you buy the house and flat on the same day you will benefit from the replacement of only or main residence exception for the house assuming you complete by 26 November 2018).
However, when you buy the flat, you will have interests in two dwellings, each worth over £40,000. The replacement of main residence exception is not available as you do not intend to live in the flat but to let it out. The surcharge will apply to the purchase of the flat.
(b) Flat first and then the house on a later date.
The flat will escape the surcharge because on the day of completion of that purchase you will only own one property. Even though it is to be let out, the surcharge does not apply.
When you later buy the house to live in, you will have more than one property, but you can rely on the replacement of main residence exception, so long as you never intended to live in the flat but always intended that as an investment to let out. This is the case even if the sale of your house in London was more than three years ago, so long as you complete the purchase of the new house to live in by 26 November 2018.
So doing the transactions in this order means neither purchase is liable to the surcharge.
Scenario 3: Couple coming together but retaining one of their properties
We together own a French holiday home, it is only worth £70,000 and we own it in equal shares.
I own another flat which I have always rented out. It is worth over £40,000.
It would be possible, if it helped escape the surcharge, for the new property to be bought entirely for the benefit of just one of us.
Are we liable to the surcharge in this case?
(a) Applying the test firstly to you, assuming that you are able to sell your previous house, then you still own other property interests.
The half share in the apartment in the French holiday home does not count against you because your share is worth less than £40,000. But you own the flat that you let out. To escape the 3% surcharge you need to benefit from the replacement of only or main residence exception.
It does not matter that your previous house has been rented out for a period before its sale, it used to be your main home and you intend to use the new property as your main home. You should therefore benefit from the replacement of main residence exception.
(b) Applying the test secondly to your wife, however, she retains her separate property that she used to live in, so she has an interest in more than one property after the transaction. She would not benefit from the replacement of only or main residence exception on her own as she is keeping her main residence. If she had lived with you in your house as her main residence, then she could benefit from your sale, but this is not the case from what you say.
It therefore seems that the purchase will be liable to the surcharge.
It would make no difference if the new property was bought for the benefit of just one of you. This is because (where a person who buys a property is married or is in a civil partnership and they live together) the spouse or civil partner is taken as being a joint buyer for the purposes of assessing whether the 3% surcharge applies, even if they are not actually a joint buyer.
Scenario 4: Order of Transactions and Effect of Exceeding Three Years
I also own a flat which I bought 15 years ago; it is rented out and I have never lived in it.
I am now in the process of selling the house and buying an apartment to live in as my only residence. I will keep the let flat. I am not sure if I will be able to sell the house at the same time as, or before, buying the apartment. I have the funds available to complete the purchase of the apartment before selling the house if necessary.
What is the position as to the 3% SDLT surcharge?
(a) Apartment bought first, but more than three years after you last lived in the house.
You will have to pay the 3% surcharge on the acquisition of the apartment and will not be able to recover the money. This is because the three year rules already apply where the purchase of the replacement apartment occurs before the sale of the previous house. You therefore fail the three year test and are not able to reclaim the surcharge once the house is sold.
(b) Apartment bought first but within the three years of you last living in the house.
The 3% surcharge will be due on the purchase of the apartment as by then there has been no disposal of the house. However, if the disposal of the house happens within three years of the purchase, then a claim can be made to recover the 3% surcharge. Do see para 3.27 of the revised Guidance Note which says if the disposal happens before the date on the land transaction return for the purchase has to be submitted, then the surcharge does not have to be paid.
(c) House sold at the same time or first, but apartment bought more than three years after the house was last lived in.
The surcharge would not be due here because of the replacement of only or main residence exception. This depends on your purchase being completed by 26 November 2018 when the transitional provisions end and the three year rules are brought in for this type of transaction.
(d) House sold at the same time or first, but apartment is bought within three years of having lived in the house.
The surcharge is not due because of the replacement of only or main residence exception. There is only a month left though to get both transactions completed.
Scenario 5: Disposal of a major interest in the former home
I had to move out and have been living in rented accommodation. I am now buying a small flat as my only residence, but have been told that I must pay the 3% surcharge as I retain an interest in the former matrimonial home worth more than £40,000. Is the surcharge due?
This article is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Advice should be sought before proceeding with any transaction.