Whistleblowing: Supreme Court’s unfair dismissal ruling in Royal Mail case gives pause for thought


9th December 2019

Employment law expert Ian Jones looks at a case that should sound an alert for companies looking to dismiss staff for spurious reasons, especially in the context of whistleblowing. This article was first published in Personnel Today on 9 December.

In a whistleblowing case which proceeded through all four tiers of our civil justice system, the Supreme Court has considered whether, in a claim for automatic unfair dismissal, a manager’s disguised reason for dismissal could be considered by the employment tribunal rather than the reason of the appointed decision-maker, who was unaware of the background.

In determining this, the court concluded that, given the particular facts, the employer could be held liable for automatic unfair dismissal following the employee’s previous protected disclosures (whistleblowing), despite the fact that the dismissing manager was unaware of those disclosures.

The case is significant because there have been some conflicting comments in previous Court of Appeal decisions about whether it is only the facts known to the decision-maker that are relevant.

Click here to read the full article.

Contact us for expert advice on whistleblowing issues and employment tribunals.

Enjoy That? You Might Like These:


articles

29 April -
The recent Court of Appeal case of Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council has confirmed that external job applicants, other than those making applications within the NHS, do not have... Read More

articles

24 April -
Recently for many UK Defined Benefit (“DB”) schemes, stellar scheme funding performance has led to Government pressure to allow corporate sponsors to more easily access surplus funding in their schemes.... Read More

articles

23 April -
The Employment Rights Bill was published on 10 October 2024 and it has hardly been out of the headlines since. Six months on, the Government has made significant amendments to... Read More