Whistleblowing: Supreme Court’s unfair dismissal ruling in Royal Mail case gives pause for thought


9th December 2019

Employment law expert Ian Jones looks at a case that should sound an alert for companies looking to dismiss staff for spurious reasons, especially in the context of whistleblowing. This article was first published in Personnel Today on 9 December.

In a whistleblowing case which proceeded through all four tiers of our civil justice system, the Supreme Court has considered whether, in a claim for automatic unfair dismissal, a manager’s disguised reason for dismissal could be considered by the employment tribunal rather than the reason of the appointed decision-maker, who was unaware of the background.

In determining this, the court concluded that, given the particular facts, the employer could be held liable for automatic unfair dismissal following the employee’s previous protected disclosures (whistleblowing), despite the fact that the dismissing manager was unaware of those disclosures.

The case is significant because there have been some conflicting comments in previous Court of Appeal decisions about whether it is only the facts known to the decision-maker that are relevant.

Click here to read the full article.

Contact us for expert advice on whistleblowing issues and employment tribunals.

Enjoy That? You Might Like These:


articles

27 May -
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has recently launched a consultation on the Code of Practice for services, public functions and associations. The consultation period ends on 30 June... Read More

newsletters

15 May -
Welcome to our bumper edition of the Spring newsletter. As can be seen, it has been an extremely busy few months. From the significant Supreme Court judgment about the legal... Read More

articles

15 May -
The Government published its white paper on proposals for the reform of the current Immigration Rules on 12 May 2025. This follows hot on the heels of big changes to... Read More