As most of you reading this will already be aware, the Employment Rights Act 2025 (“ERA 2025”) introduces major reforms to zero and low-hours contracts which are expected to take effect at some point in 2027.
Throughout the long and storied legislative process of the ERA 2025, the Government has been keen to point out that zero-hours and low-hours contracts are not being banned, and the reforms are for the benefit of workers by seeking to end one-sided flexibility.
The Government launched a consultation in June seeking views on the proposed reforms to zero-hours and similar contracts, which it estimates will benefit more than 18 million people. We explore the key issues covered by the consultation below.
Right to guaranteed hours
Qualifying workers will have the right to be offered a guaranteed contract reflecting the hours they regularly work over a reference period (which is expected to be 12 weeks, as discussed below). However, workers can still choose to remain on a zero-hours contract if they prefer to.
To be a qualifying worker, the worker must:
- be engaged on a zero or low hours contract;
- have contractually guaranteed hours which fall below a specified “hours threshold”;
- The threshold options range from 8 to 48 hours per week in the consultation, though the Government’s preference is that the threshold should be set somewhere between 8 to 20 hours.
- have worked more than their contractual hours during a “reference period”;
- The Government’s preference is that the initial reference period should be 12 weeks, though the consultation seeks views on whether the period should be 26 weeks, 52 weeks or an alternative period;
- The consultation also seeks views on whether subsequent reference periods should run consecutively or with gaps. Wherever the Government lands on this will of course affect employers’ record-keeping and administrative burden.
- have satisfied the “regularity requirement” (this is how “regularly” the worker must have worked during the reference period to qualify for a guaranteed hours offer);
- the Government is seeking views on whether the regularity requirement ought to be just a weekly requirement, or both a weekly requirement and minimum number of hours above their contractual hours requirement.
- not be an excluded worker (i.e. a seasonal worker or temporary need worker, please see further detail below).
If a qualifying worker satisfies the above requirements, the next question is how the guaranteed hours to be offered should be calculated. The consultation asks whether the guaranteed working hours should be calculated using a mean average, where every hour worked counts equally, or a median average, which places less weight on unusually busy weeks or weeks with no hours and is therefore more reflective of a typical working week.
Seasonal or temporary need workers
The Government has said that employers will not need to offer guaranteed hours contracts to workers on limited term contracts, where the term is less than the reference period (discussed above), provided the limited term is reasonable. The ERA 2025 classes a limited term as reasonable if the worker is needed for either:
- a specific task;
- until a particular event occurs; or
- for another “temporary need” as defined in regulations.
The consultation seeks views on whether there are any other circumstances in which employers may need to engage workers on limited term contracts, or whether limiting the reasonableness of such contracts to a “specific task” or until a “particular event occurs” would be sufficient to meet the needs of employers that hire seasonal workers.
Reasonable notice of shifts
Employers will be legally required to provide reasonable notice of shifts to eligible workers. The consultation seeks views on what would be reasonable notice, providing options of anywhere between one to four weeks and an “other” option.
To be eligible, workers must have a minimum number of contracted hours, which may align with the guaranteed hours requirement referred to above. The consultation proposes thresholds of between eight and 48 hours per week. The same eligibility criteria would apply to compensation for cancelled, curtailed or rescheduled shifts, discussed below.
Compensation for cancelled, curtailed or moved shifts
Eligible workers will be entitled to a “short notice payment” if shifts are cancelled, curtailed or moved at short notice and it is proposed that the short notice period cannot be greater than seven days’ notice.
The consultation seeks views on whether the short notice payment should be calculated as a percentage of the worker’s actual earnings for the relevant hours, or as a percentage of what the worker would have earned for those hours at the applicable National Minimum Wage rate. It also asks what that percentage should be, with options ranging from 10% to 80%. The Government proposes that the Fair Work Agency will enforce non-payment of short notice payments.
It should be noted that employers will not be liable to make a short notice payment where cancellation, movement or curtailment is initiated by the worker.
Agency workers
The protections outlined above will also extend to agency workers, although certain aspects will need to be adapted to reflect the tripartite nature of agency working arrangements. The consultation therefore seeks views on how these reforms should apply to agency workers.
Next steps
These reforms will be delivered in phases so that employers, businesses and workers in England, Wales and Scotland have time to plan and prepare.
The consultation invites employers for their views on how these new rights are to be implemented in practice. It is open until 25 August 2026 and the link is below for your reference.
For further information on the ERA 2025, please visit the dedicated area of our Employment Rights Act Hub, which tracks the implementation of the Act. It contains a range of articles and a detailed timeline to help you stay informed about this landmark piece of legislation.
Explore more insights
Articles 09 July
Could paid carer’s leave be on the horizon?
Is paid carer’s leave be on the horizon? We look at the current position and what a Government…
Articles 07 July
Increasing concern about Employment Tribunal backlog
What is the impact of a backlog of Employment Tribunal cases and how can this be tackled? On…
Articles 06 July
New requirements for a data protection complaints process
Data controllers, which in the context of pension schemes, may include pension scheme trustees, administrators, the employer or…

