Whistleblowing: Supreme Court’s unfair dismissal ruling in Royal Mail case gives pause for thought

9th December 2019

Employment law expert Ian Jones looks at a case that should sound an alert for companies looking to dismiss staff for spurious reasons, especially in the context of whistleblowing. This article was first published in Personnel Today on 9 December.

In a whistleblowing case which proceeded through all four tiers of our civil justice system, the Supreme Court has considered whether, in a claim for automatic unfair dismissal, a manager’s disguised reason for dismissal could be considered by the employment tribunal rather than the reason of the appointed decision-maker, who was unaware of the background.

In determining this, the court concluded that, given the particular facts, the employer could be held liable for automatic unfair dismissal following the employee’s previous protected disclosures (whistleblowing), despite the fact that the dismissing manager was unaware of those disclosures.

The case is significant because there have been some conflicting comments in previous Court of Appeal decisions about whether it is only the facts known to the decision-maker that are relevant.

Click here to read the full article.

Contact us for expert advice on whistleblowing issues and employment tribunals.

Enjoy That? You Might Like These:


15 January - Rupert Graham-Evans
Companies who are bidding for service contracts with local government should watch out for pension risks. These risks take the shape of pension funding employer costs in the Local Government... Read More


13 January - Debra Gers
With another lockdown in place across all parts of the UK, the coronavirus pandemic will continue to dominate the headlines for months to come. As with 2020, it will be... Read More


13 January - Gillian McCue
The cap of £95,000 on public sector exit payments finally came into force on 4 November 2020 when the Restriction of Public Sector Exit Payments Regulations 2020 were introduced. The... Read More